Yesterday, I wrote about one of two problems with the use of the phrase “social justice.”
Today I write of a third and more serious problem with the phrase and offer a an alternative.
I’ve used the phrase “social justice” for years, but there was always something about the phrase that didn’t sit right with me.
It wasn’t that I thought Christians should not be involved in social issues. I did.
It wasn’t that I thought the phrase had become associated with an agenda which many Christians opposed, although it probably had.
The biggest problem I had with using the phrase “social justice” is the “social” part of it. It suggests that society is responsible for injustice, and if everyone is responsible no one is responsible. Continue reading “On Social Justice, Part II”
I believe in social justice and that the church should be the leader in facilitating it.
At the same time, although I’ve used it, I’ve never been comfortable with the phrase, “social justice.”
According to the New York Times, a few weeks ago 400,000 people took to the streets of Israel to protest for “social justice.” These demonstrations were driven by demands for affordable housing, tax reform and for the creation of a welfare state.
Apparently then, social justice would include demands made by Socialists and the Tea Party, which proves the phrase has no meaning.
And that is just one of the problems with the phrase. Continue reading “On Social Justice, Part I”